Reply To: 240p / 288p at double frequency

NewHome Forums OSSC & OSSC Pro OSSC – Feature Requests 240p / 288p at double frequency Reply To: 240p / 288p at double frequency

#18484
marqs
Participant

Framebuffer and dedicated PLL would not need to replace any existing functionality, but with larger FPGA requirement (basically a BGA which would also require way more advanced PCB) it’d be tempting to select a high-performance model that could not just handle the extra memory but also do more advanced processing, drive 4K etc. Changes like that would put the device in its own league not just in terms of possible features but also unavoidably in cost and complexity (less DIY-friendly). With that in mind, it’d make more sense to implement it as a separate/successor device rather than a new OSSC revision.