OSSC for PCBs

NewHome › Forums › OSSC, OSSC Pro and DExx-vd isl › OSSC – Discussion and support › OSSC for PCBs

Viewing 6 posts - 46 through 51 (of 51 total)
1 2 3 4
  • Author
    Posts
  • August 28, 2019 at 10:11 PM #27719
    marqs
    Participant

      384×240 optim mode could be added which would use 4x horizontal multiplier (1536 width) for line4x and line5x.

      August 28, 2019 at 10:35 PM #27722
      videogameperfectionrocks
      Participant

        Fantastic!

        Will post data from a Psikyo board next…

        August 29, 2019 at 4:23 PM #27731
        videogameperfectionrocks
        Participant

          Gunbird 2 has a samplerate of 456 which puts it in the difficult 423-532 range so will have to wait for 384×240 optim mode to get it dialed in but OSSC reports 261 lines and 60.14Hz. The dotclk is 57.2727Mhz / 8 = 7.1590875Mhz.

          August 31, 2019 at 2:57 PM #27751
          videogameperfectionrocks
          Participant

            Truxton has samplerate 450 so not possible to use optim mode there either.

            270 lines
            57.6Hz
            7Mhz dotclk (according to https://pineight.com/mw/index.php?title=Dot_clock_rates)

            7000000 / ( 270 * 57.6 ) = 450.10288

            Is it normal for OSSC to report the number of lines and refresh rate inconsistently? For example trying this again I get 269 lines and 57.78Hz.

            September 9, 2019 at 7:39 PM #27826
            videogameperfectionrocks
            Participant

              Doesn’t Garegga look vertically compressed on my screen?

              View post on imgur.com

              That is in 384×240 optim mode (thanks @marqs!). It looks normal in Generic mode.

              September 10, 2019 at 10:33 PM #27833
              Harrumph
              Participant

                Yes that’s not surprising when using 384×240 mode on a 320×240 game. Remember that optimized mode can only scale by pixel repetition, i.e. integer scaling.
                Since it then multiplies by 4x on the horizontal (i.e. vertical for a TATE game), but vertical by 5x, it will look squished compared to both original or square pixel 4:3.

                Original: 320*10/11 / 240 = 1.21 (this is what you see in generic mode)
                384×240 opt: 320*4 / 240*5 = 1.067, however your screen probably also stretches the 1536 width (height in this case) to 1600 so
                1.067* 1600/1536 = 1.11
                If your screen would accept 320×240 in 5x mode, aspect would of course be full 4:3
                320*5 / 240*5 = 1.33

                Exactly these disturbances to aspect ratio is why I don’t personally like optimized modes too much. 🙂

              • Author
                Posts
              Viewing 6 posts - 46 through 51 (of 51 total)
              1 2 3 4
              • You must be logged in to reply to this topic.