My shootout of OSSC/XRGB/PVM

Viewing 4 posts - 1 through 4 (of 4 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • #11093
    leonk
    Participant

      So I was lucky enough to get all 3 for a side by side comparison. 2003 NIB PVM, XRGB mini and OSSC with 0.75 firmware all running into my late 2015 Samsung 6300 (one of their last great 1080p TV’s)

      [URL=http://smg.photobucket.com/user/leonki/media/7120A7A0-8188-4F77-8BC2-991805AEDDB0.jpg.html][IMG]http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v179/leonki/7120A7A0-8188-4F77-8BC2-991805AEDDB0.jpg[/IMG][/URL]

      My workhorse is the PVM but wanted to do a quick compare of the devices on my hd tv.

      My TV does support 3X in OSSC which is cool!

      PVM

      Pros:

      – can sync on a shoe string (out of ref Vpp and csync just work it probably has a good amp and lpf)
      – crt eye candy
      – no lag

      Cons:

      – only 20″

      XRGB mini Framemeister

      Pros:
      – hdmi. easy for newbies to get going
      – lots of different inputs (I have component adapter too)
      – osd
      – good remote
      – can’t feel lag

      cons:
      – price
      – too many options in menu
      – cant control LPF on its own
      – dreaded 10s black screen to sync
      – very sensitive to sync levels – too low and black screen
      – remote has to point directly at device

      ossc

      pros:
      – price
      – lots of options in the menu
      – granular control of filtering
      – no lag
      – very quick sync
      – identical video quality to xrgb mini

      cons:
      – no hdmi – i couldnt test audio. didnt play well with my TV ($20 devices on ebay have hdmi but this doesn’t)
      – 3X mode has a strange artifact in top right corner
      – not as user friendly for newbs
      – outside of unit shows its a community project vs commercial product
      – lpf in auto shows a bit of noise in solid background that xrgb doesnt
      – no zoom capability (used to this from xrgb and hidef nes)
      – in some spots on the screen dark, faint blotches are visible – not there with others

      mistake in 3X:

      [URL=http://smg.photobucket.com/user/leonki/media/0E69A11E-EA18-4C3E-9B9D-58C7AB9CB01C.jpg.html][IMG]http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v179/leonki/0E69A11E-EA18-4C3E-9B9D-58C7AB9CB01C.jpg[/IMG][/URL]

      #11094
      leonk
      Participant

        overall, I was very happy with ossc image quality. better than I expected from my n64rgb and nesrgb I tested with.

        But I think the no hdmi audio for me is a deal breaker like xrgb is for many with consoles that switch resolutions often.

        Hopefully this will be fixed in the future and be a real contender as xrgb mini replacement.

        awesome job!

        #11097
        BuckoA51
        Keymaster

          The strange artefact indicates a slight problem with sync, changing cables or sources should fix it.

          I dunno about not as user friendly, for most sources it should just plug and play. Getting optimal picture out of the Mini is quite a hassle.

          As for added noise, should be less than XRGB Mini not more, but without knowing your source I can’t speculate.

          HDMI audio can be added with an upgrade.

          #11099
          Anonymous

            “identical video quality to xrgb mini”

            Scaling aside, I’d say the OSSC’s video quality is far better than the Framemeister’s. In every respect.

          Viewing 4 posts - 1 through 4 (of 4 total)
          • You must be logged in to reply to this topic.