OSSC and Framemeister together: possible benefits?
- This topic has 1 reply, 2 voices, and was last updated March 10, 2020 at 4:50 AM by .
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.
NewHome › Forums › OSSC, OSSC Pro and DExx-vd isl › OSSC – Discussion and support › OSSC and Framemeister together: possible benefits?
Tagged: ossc
Hello! First I just wanted to say that I just got a new OSSC and I am loving it. After getting a Framemeister and being disappointed with the results, I invested in the OSSC, and I am glad I did. The colors are better, there is less lag, and it is easier to use.
Now I am curious if anyone has tried using the OSSC and Framemeister together. All I can find are posts and articles related to one vs the other. But I figured I would ask and see if anyone found any benefit to using both, before I decide to ship my FM back lol. Specifically, I’m wondering if it will have any benefit for 480i content.
There’s some benefit; namely that the Framemeister can normalize out-of-spec framerates that the OSSC can’t do anything about, and it can perform last-mile scaling, such as bringing 960p (from line4x 240p or line2x 480p, for example) to 1080p; and, yes, you can set 480i/576i proc on the OSSC to passthrough to have the Framemeister perform deinterlacing and scaling to 1080p.
What it won’t get you is seamless transitions between video modes. The Framemeister, for whatever reason, doesn’t support seamless transitions between video modes (and, obviously, neither does the OSSC); so, when a game switches from 240p to 480i, or 480i to 240p, you’ll get an HDMI blackout that can take your setup a few seconds to recover from (and can get worse with more HDMI devices in the chain to the display). You’d need to wait for the OSSC Pro to avoid HDMI blackouts (and, even then, it may not be available until a later firmware update).
NewHome › Forums › OSSC, OSSC Pro and DExx-vd isl › OSSC – Discussion and support › OSSC and Framemeister together: possible benefits?
Tagged: ossc
Hello! First I just wanted to say that I just got a new OSSC and I am loving it. After getting a Framemeister and being disappointed with the results, I invested in the OSSC, and I am glad I did. The colors are better, there is less lag, and it is easier to use.
Now I am curious if anyone has tried using the OSSC and Framemeister together. All I can find are posts and articles related to one vs the other. But I figured I would ask and see if anyone found any benefit to using both, before I decide to ship my FM back lol. Specifically, I’m wondering if it will have any benefit for 480i content.
There’s some benefit; namely that the Framemeister can normalize out-of-spec framerates that the OSSC can’t do anything about, and it can perform last-mile scaling, such as bringing 960p (from line4x 240p or line2x 480p, for example) to 1080p; and, yes, you can set 480i/576i proc on the OSSC to passthrough to have the Framemeister perform deinterlacing and scaling to 1080p.
What it won’t get you is seamless transitions between video modes. The Framemeister, for whatever reason, doesn’t support seamless transitions between video modes (and, obviously, neither does the OSSC); so, when a game switches from 240p to 480i, or 480i to 240p, you’ll get an HDMI blackout that can take your setup a few seconds to recover from (and can get worse with more HDMI devices in the chain to the display). You’d need to wait for the OSSC Pro to avoid HDMI blackouts (and, even then, it may not be available until a later firmware update).
| Cookie | Duration | Description |
|---|---|---|
| _gat | 1 minute | This cookie is installed by Google Universal Analytics to restrain request rate and thus limit the collection of data on high traffic sites. |
| Cookie | Duration | Description |
|---|---|---|
| __gads | 1 year 24 days | The __gads cookie, set by Google, is stored under DoubleClick domain and tracks the number of times users see an advert, measures the success of the campaign and calculates its revenue. This cookie can only be read from the domain they are set on and will not track any data while browsing through other sites. |
| _ga | 2 years | The _ga cookie, installed by Google Analytics, calculates visitor, session and campaign data and also keeps track of site usage for the site's analytics report. The cookie stores information anonymously and assigns a randomly generated number to recognize unique visitors. |
| _gid | 1 day | Installed by Google Analytics, _gid cookie stores information on how visitors use a website, while also creating an analytics report of the website's performance. Some of the data that are collected include the number of visitors, their source, and the pages they visit anonymously. |
| Cookie | Duration | Description |
|---|---|---|
| IDE | 1 year 24 days | Google DoubleClick IDE cookies are used to store information about how the user uses the website to present them with relevant ads and according to the user profile. |
| test_cookie | 15 minutes | The test_cookie is set by doubleclick.net and is used to determine if the user's browser supports cookies. |
| Cookie | Duration | Description |
|---|---|---|
| ct_checked_emails | session | No description |
| ct_has_scrolled | session | No description |
| ct_mouse_moved | session | No description |
| ct_screen_info | session | No description |
| wordpress_apbct_antibot | session | No description |
| wp_woocommerce_session_9cc3598a6315be16da4f85bb374cf6a5 | 2 days | No description |