NewHome › Forums › OSSC, OSSC Pro and DExx-vd isl › OSSC – Discussion and support › OSSC Pro Noisy Video Compared to OSSC
marqs.
Hello. I recently received a OSSC Pro, hoping to replace my original OSSC with something with more options. But the Pro does not appear to be filtering out video noise nearly as well. I have tried various settings, cables, and even power outlets, but cannot achieve similar levels of quality between the two devices even in identical scenarios. Using the original OSSC to digitize the signal, then running that to the Pro, produces the best results, but adds additional complexity that is awkward to deal with.
I recorded some footage to demonstrate what I am seeing, along with a description of the setup and consoles involved.
Thank you for your time
Perplexing. The OSSC Pro’s on-chip low pass filter is considered better and more flexible than the classics so really you should be seeing the exact opposite here.
Have you tried running the tests using the PSU from your OSSC Classic with your OSSC Pro?
I didn’t try using the original OSSC PSU because the product page said it wasn’t recommended, but I just tested it and the results are identical.
OSSC Classic uses external LPF chip which presumably has higher order filter. In some cases that might result to smoother picture, but in general ADC section in Pro should result to superior image
Are there any steps I could be taking to bring the Pro’s output more in line with the Classic’s?
Unfortunately there is no straightforward solution. A LPF chip would need to be added inside console or analog filter used in between if heavier noise removal is needed.
NewHome › Forums › OSSC, OSSC Pro and DExx-vd isl › OSSC – Discussion and support › OSSC Pro Noisy Video Compared to OSSC
marqs.Hello. I recently received a OSSC Pro, hoping to replace my original OSSC with something with more options. But the Pro does not appear to be filtering out video noise nearly as well. I have tried various settings, cables, and even power outlets, but cannot achieve similar levels of quality between the two devices even in identical scenarios. Using the original OSSC to digitize the signal, then running that to the Pro, produces the best results, but adds additional complexity that is awkward to deal with.
I recorded some footage to demonstrate what I am seeing, along with a description of the setup and consoles involved.
Thank you for your time
Perplexing. The OSSC Pro’s on-chip low pass filter is considered better and more flexible than the classics so really you should be seeing the exact opposite here.
Have you tried running the tests using the PSU from your OSSC Classic with your OSSC Pro?
I didn’t try using the original OSSC PSU because the product page said it wasn’t recommended, but I just tested it and the results are identical.
OSSC Classic uses external LPF chip which presumably has higher order filter. In some cases that might result to smoother picture, but in general ADC section in Pro should result to superior image
Are there any steps I could be taking to bring the Pro’s output more in line with the Classic’s?
Unfortunately there is no straightforward solution. A LPF chip would need to be added inside console or analog filter used in between if heavier noise removal is needed.
| Cookie | Duration | Description |
|---|---|---|
| _gat | 1 minute | This cookie is installed by Google Universal Analytics to restrain request rate and thus limit the collection of data on high traffic sites. |
| Cookie | Duration | Description |
|---|---|---|
| __gads | 1 year 24 days | The __gads cookie, set by Google, is stored under DoubleClick domain and tracks the number of times users see an advert, measures the success of the campaign and calculates its revenue. This cookie can only be read from the domain they are set on and will not track any data while browsing through other sites. |
| _ga | 2 years | The _ga cookie, installed by Google Analytics, calculates visitor, session and campaign data and also keeps track of site usage for the site's analytics report. The cookie stores information anonymously and assigns a randomly generated number to recognize unique visitors. |
| _gid | 1 day | Installed by Google Analytics, _gid cookie stores information on how visitors use a website, while also creating an analytics report of the website's performance. Some of the data that are collected include the number of visitors, their source, and the pages they visit anonymously. |
| Cookie | Duration | Description |
|---|---|---|
| IDE | 1 year 24 days | Google DoubleClick IDE cookies are used to store information about how the user uses the website to present them with relevant ads and according to the user profile. |
| test_cookie | 15 minutes | The test_cookie is set by doubleclick.net and is used to determine if the user's browser supports cookies. |
| Cookie | Duration | Description |
|---|---|---|
| ct_checked_emails | session | No description |
| ct_has_scrolled | session | No description |
| ct_mouse_moved | session | No description |
| ct_screen_info | session | No description |
| wordpress_apbct_antibot | session | No description |
| wp_woocommerce_session_9cc3598a6315be16da4f85bb374cf6a5 | 2 days | No description |
